top of page

Group

Public·5 members

Amd A6 Vs Intel I3


Download >>> https://urlin.us/2tuIul





AMD A6 vs Intel i3: Which Processor is Better for Your Needs


If you are looking for a budget-friendly processor for your laptop or desktop, you might be wondering whether to choose AMD A6 or Intel i3. Both processors are popular choices for entry-level and mid-range systems, but they have different features and performance levels. In this article, we will compare AMD A6 vs Intel i3 in terms of specifications, benchmarks, gaming, power consumption, and price. By the end of this article, you will have a better idea of which processor suits your needs better.


AMD A6 vs Intel i3: Specifications


AMD A6 and Intel i3 are both dual-core processors with four threads, meaning they can handle up to four tasks simultaneously. However, they have different clock speeds, cache sizes, and architectures that affect their performance.


Processor


Clock Speed


Boost Speed


Cache


Architecture


Graphics


AMD A6-6400K


3.9 GHz


4.1 GHz


1 MB L2


Richland (32 nm)


Radeon HD 8470D


Intel Core i3-3220


3.3 GHz


N/A


3 MB L3


Ivy Bridge (22 nm)


HD Graphics 2500


As you can see from the table above, the AMD A6-6400K has a higher clock speed and boost speed than the Intel Core i3-3220, which means it can process data faster. However, the Intel Core i3-3220 has a larger cache size and a smaller architecture, which means it can store more data and consume less power. The AMD A6-6400K also has a better integrated graphics card than the Intel Core i3-3220, which means it can handle more demanding games and applications.


AMD A6 vs Intel i3: Benchmarks


Benchmarks are tests that measure the performance of a processor in various scenarios. They can give us an idea of how well a processor can handle tasks such as gaming, video editing, web browsing, and multitasking. Here are some benchmark results from UserBenchmark.com for the AMD A6-6400K and the Intel Core i3-3220:


Benchmark


AMD A6-6400K


Intel Core i3-3220


Difference


Effective Speed


39.8%